Thomas Steen Brandi
Partner
Oslo
Norway, Sweden, Denmark, UK
Published:
Russia continues to be a focal point for sanctions development. This spring and summer, the EU adopted two new sanctions packages against Russia: the 20th package, adopted on 23 April 2026, and the 21st package, adopted on 23 July 2026. The 20th package has been implemented in Norwegian law, while the 21st package is expected to follow. The developments continue the expansion of the sanctions, including extending part of the scope to Kyrgyzstan and Indonesian territory. There are also key developments outside of the Russian sanctions packages, including a recent Chinese court decision rejecting compliance with foreign sanctions as a defence to breach of contract, as well as the Norwegian Government's recent bill proposal prohibiting trade with Israeli settlements in Palestine.
The 20th sanctions package was adopted by the Council on 23 April 2026, introducing further amendments to the existing framework of restrictive measures in response to Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine. The package comprises a range of measures concerning Russia's energy revenues, military-industrial complex, and trade and financial services, 120 new individual listings, and several structural innovations, including the first-ever use of the EU's anti-circumvention tool. Norway implemented the 20th package into Norwegian law with amendments that entered into force on 14 July 2026, largely corresponding to the EU measures.
Energy measures
Financial measures and crypto
Trade measures and military-industrial complex
Other measures
The EU's 21st sanctions package was adopted by the Council on 23 July 2026. It is the largest package of individual listings adopted in the past four years, adding 218 listings in total (48 individuals and 170 entities). The package has not yet been implemented in Norwegian law. However, as Norway has consistently aligned with previous EU sanctions against Russia, it is expected to be implemented through amendments to the sanctions regulations. We are monitoring the political and legal developments closely.
Energy measures
Financial measures and crypto
Trade measures and military-industrial complex
On 3 August 2026, the EU received €1.4 billion in interest income generated by immobilised assets belonging to Russia's central bank – the fifth transfer of its kind, covering revenue from the first half of 2026. In total, the immobilised assets have generated €8 billion since they were frozen. The funds are being split, with 95% going to the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism (helping Ukraine repay the EU's macro-financial assistance loan and G7 loans), and 5% to cover military and defence-related needs. The underlying assets themselves remain frozen, but the Council has ruled that the interest they generate does not belong to Russia and can therefore be used to support Ukraine.
Chinese countermeasures to Western trade restrictions continues to be a hot topic, as China recently issued its first judicial confirmation that compliance with foreign sanctions cannot excuse a breach of contract. In a Shanghai Maritime Court judgment, published by the Supreme People's Court on 24 June 2026 as a 2025 national typical maritime case, a Singaporean carrier was found liable for refusing cargo delivery based on the shipper's foreign sanctions listing, and ordered to pay the Hong Kong shipper approximately RMB 4.99 million plus interest. This marks the first judicial application of China's Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law (AFSL), with the court holding that Article 12 overrides the parties' choice of law or contractual arrangements.
While a typical case is not binding precedent, it carries significant weight and is generally followed by Chinese courts. For clients with Chinese counterparties, the key takeaway is that a sanctions clause can no longer be treated as a safe default for pausing or terminating the performance of contractual obligations, as Chinese courts may reject it as a valid defence. Combined with an earlier Nanjing Maritime Court case and new regulatory tools, this suggests Chinese authorities are encouraging more proactive use of the AFSL, and we expect more AFSL-based claims and defences going forward.
For our clients with Chinese counterparties, the decision is a reminder that where Chinese law or Chinese courts are relevant, reliance on foreign-sanctions clauses may not shield a party from liability for non-performance under Chinese law.
Sanctions also continue to be a topic in the context of the Israel and Palestine conflict. On 19 June 2026, the Norwegian Government submitted for public consultation a proposal for a new law prohibiting trade with Israeli settlements in Palestine. The proposal would introduce four prohibitions: (i) import/export of goods originating in or destined for the settlements; (ii) purchase or acquisition of real estate; (iii) provision of certain property-related services; and (iv) acquisition of stakes in businesses in the settlements. Only two exceptions are proposed – a sufficient Palestinian nexus, and a humanitarian carve-out.
Violations would constitute criminal offences, with the ordinary double criminality requirement disapplied so conduct abroad can still be prosecuted in Norway. Businesses trading with Israel, engaging in settlement-related real estate or share acquisitions, or providing related services – including banks, insurers and freight forwarders exposed via complicity liability – should review their supply chains and due diligence frameworks. This should include indirect trade exposure. Companies with a U.S. nexus should also watch for potential tension with U.S. anti-boycott laws, which the Ministry's proposal unfortunately is yet to address in the bill proposal.
The consultation period runs until 19 September 2026, with adoption not likely before the end of 2026 or early 2027. At the EU level, an EU-wide ban on imports from Israeli settlements is also under consideration, with the issue recently having been discussed among EU foreign ministers on 13 July 2026. We will be monitoring the political and legal developments on this field closely.
Schjødt's corporate compliance team is experienced in all aspects of sanctions and export control-related matters, including risk assessments and associated review of projects, business partners and M&A-activities that may entail an increased sanctions risk. We have an extensive global network consisting of leading compliance and white-collar crime specialists and can efficiently include relevant local knowledge in our assistance.
Please note that these updates do not constitute legal advice, nor do they provide an exhaustive description of all sanctions in place and the exemptions. Any person or entity involved, directly or indirectly, in business activities in any way directly or indirectly related to countries, entities or persons targeted by sanctions should carefully assess how they are affected by the sanctions. Schjødt's team is ready to assist in this regard.