Morten W. Platou
by Morten Platou and Olav K. Eidsaa
On 28 March, the Directorate of Taxes changed its position in a new statement that can be read here. Thus, the Kruse Smith model reappears as an incentive model.
If an employee acquires shares in the employer for a consideration that is lower than the market value of the shares, the employee is taxed for the benefit of the discount at the time of acquisition. The benefit is taxed as earned income. In the Kruse Smith judgment (Rt. 2000 p. 758), the Supreme Court considered whether the acquisition of shares at nominal value (7% of the shares' fair value) should be taxed as a benefit gained from earned income. The shares were purchased on the condition that the discount at the time of acquisition had to be repaid upon later realization of the shares. If the consideration for the shares did not cover the discount at the time of acquisition, the discount at the time of acquisition only had to be repaid as far as the consideration extended. The Supreme Court concluded that no lower price had been paid at the purchase of the shares and that a sufficient financial risk had been taken for the return on the shares to be regarded as capital income (and not earned income). The Supreme Court did not take a direct position on the question of how the discount at the time of acquisition should be handled. However, the Supreme Court commented that the discount at the time of acquisition had to be regarded as a loan on which interest had to be calculated, to avoid taxation on the benefit of a tax-free loan.
Following the Supreme Court's decision, the tax authorities have issued several advance rulings based on the Kruse Smith model. The tax authorities have also stated that interest must be calculated on the discount at the time of acquisition and that any subsequent waiver of the discount at the time of acquisition entails a benefit for the employee, which is to be taxed as earned income. In practice, the model has proved to be a good solution where employees want to acquire shares in the employer company, but where the risk and liquidity burden for the employee has been an obstacle.
The practice relating to the Kruse Smith model has been more or less uniform since 2000. It was therefore surprising when the Directorate of Taxes issued a statement of principle on 1 January stating that employees who acquire shares according to the Kruse Smith model should be taxed at the time of acquisition. The Directorate of Taxes' view was that the discount at the time of acquisition could not be regarded as a loan for tax purposes, as long as the loan does not have an unconditional repayment obligation. The statement was not consistent with neither the Supreme Court ruling in the Kruse Smith case nor the subsequent administrative practice.
The statement of principle issued on 28 March replaces the statement issued on 1 January. With the statement of principle, the Directorate of Taxes changes its position. The following can be extracted from the new statement of principle:
Schjødt's tax department has assisted many clients with the establishment of various incentive programs following the Kruse Smith model and has obtained several advance rulings from the Tax Authorities regarding the scheme. We believe it is positive that the Directorate of Taxes has published a new statement of principles, which is in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in the Kruse Smith judgment and the Tax Authorities' long-standing practice.